PRIVACY OR PUBLICITY CONCERNS
What privacy or publicity concerns might a company have about the discovery process in traditional litigation?
The privacy and publicity concerns are most likely going to come up in the discovery process of a trial and can be damaging to the case or helpful depending on all relevant information being provided (Lee 2019). I found it interesting in reading the information about laws in the United States differ from other places in the world. According to Lee (2019), standing is vital to a case as only the person that is harmed already by something may go to court. I have never heard of the word ripeness until today, explaining that some countries will listen to suppose this could happen type lawsuits (Lee 2019). I am sure the United States would be more jammed with cases if we did not have the rules that controversy has to exist to listen to claims that have legal precedence.
Interestingly, some cases are handled in a venue or area of a state based on the possibility of biased judges or jurors that may not be fair because they have heard the news side of a story and not all the facts (Lee 2019). I think currently with social media; it probably can get a bit complicated also because sometimes a person will listen and not do research. I had to serve on a grand jury for a month listening to 99 cases. In my situation, I was to decide with other jurors voting if enough evidence existed for a case to go to court. It is essential to know that in this case that it is only checking if enough evidence exists to take a person to court and not determine if they are guilty of not guilty. Some instances can tug at your heartstrings, and it is imperative to be sure and see if enough evidence exists for it to go to the next level. Much personal information can come up and is disclosed that can be hard on the victim or the accused. Respond?
Answer and Explanation
By providing all pertinent material, the discovery process may either assist or harm a case based on the privacy and publicity problems that may arise. I thought it fascinating to learn about the differences in legislation between the United States and other countries. standing is crucial to a lawsuit since only those who have previously been hurt by anything are entitled to go to court. There is a term that I had never heard before today, ripeness, which explains why certain nations are willing to accept the idea that this sort of case may arise. If we didn’t have the laws requiring that there be some kind of legal precedent for a claim to be admissible, I’m sure the U.s would be a lot more crowded with cases.
Because of the likelihood of biased judges or jurors, certain cases are handled in some areas of a region depending on the possibility of hearing just the news side of a story and not the whole truth. If you’re relying on social media, things might become a little complex since people may just listen and not do their own investigation. It took me a month to hear 99 different cases on a grand jury. In my instance, I and the other jurors had to determine whether there was enough data for a case to go to trial. Whether adequate proof exists, a person may be taken to court, but not if they’re guilty or not guilty. This is vital information to know. There are cases that may make your heartache, but you need to be certain and check whether there is enough proof to take it further.
