1. Write a one-paragraph summary of the piece.
The paragraph should be long enough to describe the major points and the types of evidence
and argument used in the piece, but should also be concise. About 50-75 words may suffice for
a short or simple piece, while a more complex piece may require a 150-word summary. Do not
exceed 200 words.
2. Write a one-paragraph evaluation of the piece.

3. Advanced: Identify, with examples, some of the argumentation techniques, types of evidence, and
logical fallacies (if any) used by the author. Think beyond the piece, to how other relevant arguments
and evidence might apply
Here is the response
1. Put it in the required format and answer all the skipped questions. What I see here is a vague answer to 1a, plus your answers to Part 3 (summary and evaluation). You did pretty well finding Zhu’s main points in your summary. But where are your answers to the rest of part 1 and part 2?
2. Correct a sentence fragment (i.e., don’t start a sentence with "because").
3. Did Zhu really find it "very easy" to get support?
4. What do you mean by "place value on the perspectives"? This is unclear.
5. What do you mean by "isolating the issue, and rational appeals" and "widely describes"?