HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER BOYLAN VIRTUAL ETHICS PERFECT FRIENDSHIP ESSAY – ASSIGNMENT HELP

I’m working on a philosophy project and need an explanation to help me understand better.

The requirement is to choose either pro con wright about it as much as you can since it is a philosophy subject it require 5 pages but would it be more like to right more. I have attached pdf file you will choose on argument there’re 8 argument from page 19-35 you will choose on argument. The book size is too big and I could not uploaded the is the link to access the book. https://sa1lib.org/book/5399184/3ec9e2 I also try to copy and past the book but it would be more clear toupee the link ands the book.

Pro Essay (5 pages)

Pro Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion: (give conclusion). He supports this conclusion with the following premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise). This essay will examine each premise in the light of objectors and then defend the author from these objections.

The possible objection to the first premise (give the objection(s)).

Reply to the first objection (give pointed reply).

The possible objection to the second premise (give the objection(s)).

Reply to the second objection (give pointed reply).

Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)

Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).

Con Essay (5 pages)

Con Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion (give conclusion). He bases his argument on two objectionable premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise). It will be the contention of this essay that these premises are mistaken thus rendering the conclusion unproven.

Objection to the first premise (give objection).

Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)

Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)

Objection to the second premise (give objection).

Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)

Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)

Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)

Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today.