Baggini in chapter 1-2 Atheism, argues that there is not ” good evidence of God . He argues this based on a standard of good evidence and his idea of abduction. what is his standard of evedence and abduction? Do you agree or disagree with Baggini regarding the kind of evidence that is good evidence and whether good evidence is available to prove the existence of God this is not about religon as a whole just about whether there is evidence to support the idea of God. keep foused on this. provide an analogical example to support your positon and reasons you think Baggini is right or wrong. Frankfurt, in On Bullshit provides a definiton of Bullshit. what is that definition? is an argument for God’s existance bullshit in Frankfurt’s sense or is it not? Provide an argument to support your point of view in which you support conclusion with reason and a demonstrative example to clarify your position. After reflection on the two above consideration, can one justifibly state that “God Exists” is a true statment? One cannot justifiable do so based on faith.faith does not require justification, so this cannot be your defense. if your position agrees with earlier points you have made avove in Frankfurt and Baggini, explain why, referring to earlier points in your arguments above, explain why knowledge of God’s existance is justified as true knowlege in other words what makes it true knowlege?