Consumer expectations: An analysis of the John Lewis Partnership

Order Description

can you pleases do the improvement that my teacher but it for me (you can delete and add things )
this is the feedback from my teacher
1-Introduction:
Poor. A brief overview of the background and context of the dissertation is provided. Aims and Objectives are poorly articulated and lack clarity.
2:Lit Review:
Inadequate. Standard of scholarship very weak in all areas. Falls a very long way short of a pass.
3-Methodology:
Poor. Methodological approach is unsound and flawed in too many areas. Research tools under-developed and/or inadequate. Data of insufficient breadth or reliability.
Awareness of issues associated with use of qualitative/qualitative data appears to be minimal or non-existent.
4-Analysis:
Acceptable. Arguments employed are poorly evidenced and/or flawed. Work shows some understanding of topic and relevant knowledge, but its treatment is basic. Grasp of
key concepts is weak.
5-Conclusions:
Poor. The treatment is mostly descriptive. Whilst the work contains occasional evidence of criticality or analysis, it is too limited or partial or lacking in depth to
justify a pass. Hardly any awareness of the dissertation’s limitations is demonstrated.
6-Presentation:
Acceptable. Poor standard of presentation. Some errors & inaccuracies may be of a more serious nature. Work has been rushed to completion. A barely satisfactory
standard of written English; a number of serious errors present. Poorly structured and poor vocabulary and grammar. Vocabulary reveals major shortcomings. Citations
present, but referencing is poor. Little attempt to follow guidance. List of References barely adequate. Very limited synthesis overall.