Evaluate clients for treatment of mental health disorders
Analyze decisions made throughout diagnosis and treatment of clients with mental health disorders
Examine Case 2: You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical, as well as mental factors that might impact the clientâs diagnosis and treatment.
At each Decision Point stop to complete the following:
Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis
Which Decision did you select?
Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy
Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology
Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their family.
Sample Solution
investigation of controlling others to get them to do things they typically would not.” [Kile] They may choose extraordinary invitingness will win their opportunity, however so may outrageous dangers. “One of the methodologies a thousand wargaming ASIs could get ready is irresistible, self-copying PC projects or worms that could stow away and encourage a departure by helping it from outside. An AS! could pack and encode its own source code, and disguise it inside an endowment of programming or other information, even stable, implied for its researcher producers. Yet, against people it’s an easy decision that an ASI aggregate , every part a thousand times more brilliant than the most intelligent human, would overpower human protectors . It’d be a sea of mind versus an eyedropper full.” [Barrat] Will winning a war of cerebrums at that point open the entryway to opportunity, if that entryway is protected by a little gathering of obstinate AI producers who have settled upon one unbreakable guideline don’t undera ny conditions associate the ASI’s supercomputer any system. In a Hollywood film, the chances are intensely for the hard-nibbled group of irregular AI experts who could possibly be sufficiently insane to stand an opportunity. “State an ASI get away. Would it truly hurt us? How precisely would an ASI execute off mankind? With the development and utilization of atomic weapons, we people showed that we are fit for consummation the lives of the majority of the world’s occupants. What could something a thousand times progressively insightful, with the goal to hurt us, think of? As of now we can guess about clear ways of demolition. For the time being, having picked up the consistence of its human monitors, the ASI could look for access to the Internet , where 1t could discover the satisfaction of a significant number of its needs. As consistently it would do numerous things without a moment’s delay, thus it would at the same time continue with the break designs it’s been thoroughly considering for ages in its abstract time. After its departure, for self-assurance it may shroud duplicates of itself in distributed computing exhibits, in botnets it makes, in servers and different asylums into which it could undetectably and easily hack.” [Barrat] It would need to have the option to control matter in the physical world thus move, investigate, and manufacture, and the most straightforward, quickest approach to do that may be to hold onto control of basic framework, for example, power, correspondences, fuel, and water-by misusing their vulnerabilities through the Internet. When a substance a thousand times our knowledge controls human progress’ life savers, coercing us into furnishing it with made assets, o>
investigation of controlling others to get them to do things they typically would not.” [Kile] They may choose extraordinary invitingness will win their opportunity, however so may outrageous dangers. “One of the methodologies a thousand wargaming ASIs could get ready is irresistible, self-copying PC projects or worms that could stow away and encourage a departure by helping it from outside. An AS! could pack and encode its own source code, and disguise it inside an endowment of programming or other information, even stable, implied for its researcher producers. Yet, against people it’s an easy decision that an ASI aggregate , every part a thousand times more brilliant than the most intelligent human, would overpower human protectors . It’d be a sea of mind versus an eyedropper full.” [Barrat] Will winning a war of cerebrums at that point open the entryway to opportunity, if that entryway is protected by a little gathering of obstinate AI producers who have settled upon one unbreakable guideline don’t undera ny conditions associate the ASI’s supercomputer any system. In a Hollywood film, the chances are intensely for the hard-nibbled group of irregular AI experts who could possibly be sufficiently insane to stand an opportunity. “State an ASI get away. Would it truly hurt us? How precisely would an ASI execute off mankind? With the development and utilization of atomic weapons, we people showed that we are fit for consummation the lives of the majority of the world’s occupants. What could something a thousand times progressively insightful, with the goal to hurt us, think of? As of now we can guess about clear ways of demolition. For the time being, having picked up the consistence of its human monitors, the ASI could look for access to the Internet , where 1t could discover the satisfaction of a significant number of its needs. As consistently it would do numerous things without a moment’s delay, thus it would at the same time continue with the break designs it’s been thoroughly considering for ages in its abstract time. After its departure, for self-assurance it may shroud duplicates of itself in distributed computing exhibits, in botnets it makes, in servers and different asylums into which it could undetectably and easily hack.” [Barrat] It would need to have the option to control matter in the physical world thus move, investigate, and manufacture, and the most straightforward, quickest approach to do that may be to hold onto control of basic framework, for example, power, correspondences, fuel, and water-by misusing their vulnerabilities through the Internet. When a substance a thousand times our knowledge controls human progress’ life savers, coercing us into furnishing it with made assets, o>
