Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss action taken for reform and restructuring and the role of the nurse within this changing environment.
Include the following:
Outline a current or emerging health care law or federal regulation introduced to reform or restructure some aspect of the health care delivery system. Describe the effect of this on nursing practice and the nurse’s role and responsibility.
Discuss how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient outcomes. Explain how these affect nursing practice and describe the expectations and responsibilities of the nursing role in these situations.
Discuss professional nursing leadership and management roles that have arisen and how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings.
Research emerging trends. Predict two ways in which the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform within the next five years to respond to upcoming trends or predicted issues in health care.
Sample Solution
Profound nature goes past a constrained shallow way to deal with ecological issues. It offers an exhaustive philosophical structure that contends the basic beliefs of social work and its ordinary biological models must be reached out to help the new substances of the ecological emergencies (Besthorn, 2012). Profound environment is the ‘development of biological awareness’ (McLaughlin, 1987, p.2), the conviction that there is no ontological gap in the field of presence and no partition as a general rule between the human and non-human domain (Fox, 1984). In the prompt result of the oil slick, BP rushed to fault Transocean â the proprietors of the boring apparatus that burst into flames and detonated. The organization’s endeavor to diminish imminent repercussions by passing on the accuse features how BPs essential concern remained their notoriety and benefit, as opposed to organizing the earth in an occasion as inconvenient as this. Past BP’s pitiful methodology taken to relieve the spill, it was found BP had undermined various wellbeing techniques during the unearthing of the all around saw as answerable for the 2010 oil slick. By leaving a test valve on the victory preventer and flipping around it, BP abstained from pulling back the pipe for testing â sparing $260,000 with each test (Cherry and Sneirson, 2010). In the event that BP had pursued right techniques and not cut-corners for benefit boost â exhuming methods would have been done accurately and kept the spill from regularly happening. The Deepwater Horizon oil slick was not a disconnected occurrence be that as it may, as showed by the organization’s shocking reputation of security infringement [Appendix 1]. Through BP’s endeavor to pass the fault, a dull way to deal with cure the spill and various other natural debacles the organization was at that point considered responsible for, it’s obvious that BP had a total dismissal for the earth. Apparently, earth dangerous companies like BP present as companions of nature exclusively trying to protect and grow their business sectors (Bruno and Karlinger, 2002). This reflects how BP’s kindheartedness was restricted to regions that would be productive for the company’s investors and didn’t take part in CSR past that level (Cherry and Sneirson, 2010). This shallow biological way to deal with ecological issues is an impression of humankind’s instrumentalist perspective on nature. The standard shallow perspective attempts to guarantee the same old thing through the advocation of green advertising, where the focal target remains the advantage and luxuriousness of people (Naess, 2001). BP’s response to the oil slick identifies with the possibility of anthropocentrism â the possibility that people have strength over nature. The absence of direness displayed features the idea that people see nature to be available to us â to be abused for humankind’s advantage. We consider ourselves to be independent and separated from our encapsulated encounters in the normal world (Baard, 2015). It is this egocentric point of view that is on a very basic level to fault for ecological calamities. Transnational organizations don’t have any acknowledgment of the characteristic estimation of all living things â where the wealth and decent variety of life ought to be secured for the wellbeing of its own, paying little mind to instrumental worth (Baard, 2015). It is because of this perspective that the financial government of huge transnational enterprises is driving the loss of worldwide biodiversity (Besthorn, 2012). For whatever length of time that this extraneous, egocentric perspective endures, shallow logical environmentalism will stay inadequate and keep on coming up short at the undertaking of important, long haul social change. Accordingly, TNCs need to move away from this outward perspective and see nature past its fiscal worth â to see nature for its very own respect. Moving to an ecocentric perspective where the biosphere turns into the primary focal point of concern would supplant the fragmentary view with the possibility that everything is associated (Madsen, 2016). Just with an ideological move from an outward to inherent perspective will oil organizations, for example, BP cease from ‘compromising at the conditions cost.>
Profound nature goes past a constrained shallow way to deal with ecological issues. It offers an exhaustive philosophical structure that contends the basic beliefs of social work and its ordinary biological models must be reached out to help the new substances of the ecological emergencies (Besthorn, 2012). Profound environment is the ‘development of biological awareness’ (McLaughlin, 1987, p.2), the conviction that there is no ontological gap in the field of presence and no partition as a general rule between the human and non-human domain (Fox, 1984). In the prompt result of the oil slick, BP rushed to fault Transocean â the proprietors of the boring apparatus that burst into flames and detonated. The organization’s endeavor to diminish imminent repercussions by passing on the accuse features how BPs essential concern remained their notoriety and benefit, as opposed to organizing the earth in an occasion as inconvenient as this. Past BP’s pitiful methodology taken to relieve the spill, it was found BP had undermined various wellbeing techniques during the unearthing of the all around saw as answerable for the 2010 oil slick. By leaving a test valve on the victory preventer and flipping around it, BP abstained from pulling back the pipe for testing â sparing $260,000 with each test (Cherry and Sneirson, 2010). In the event that BP had pursued right techniques and not cut-corners for benefit boost â exhuming methods would have been done accurately and kept the spill from regularly happening. The Deepwater Horizon oil slick was not a disconnected occurrence be that as it may, as showed by the organization’s shocking reputation of security infringement [Appendix 1]. Through BP’s endeavor to pass the fault, a dull way to deal with cure the spill and various other natural debacles the organization was at that point considered responsible for, it’s obvious that BP had a total dismissal for the earth. Apparently, earth dangerous companies like BP present as companions of nature exclusively trying to protect and grow their business sectors (Bruno and Karlinger, 2002). This reflects how BP’s kindheartedness was restricted to regions that would be productive for the company’s investors and didn’t take part in CSR past that level (Cherry and Sneirson, 2010). This shallow biological way to deal with ecological issues is an impression of humankind’s instrumentalist perspective on nature. The standard shallow perspective attempts to guarantee the same old thing through the advocation of green advertising, where the focal target remains the advantage and luxuriousness of people (Naess, 2001). BP’s response to the oil slick identifies with the possibility of anthropocentrism â the possibility that people have strength over nature. The absence of direness displayed features the idea that people see nature to be available to us â to be abused for humankind’s advantage. We consider ourselves to be independent and separated from our encapsulated encounters in the normal world (Baard, 2015). It is this egocentric point of view that is on a very basic level to fault for ecological calamities. Transnational organizations don’t have any acknowledgment of the characteristic estimation of all living things â where the wealth and decent variety of life ought to be secured for the wellbeing of its own, paying little mind to instrumental worth (Baard, 2015). It is because of this perspective that the financial government of huge transnational enterprises is driving the loss of worldwide biodiversity (Besthorn, 2012). For whatever length of time that this extraneous, egocentric perspective endures, shallow logical environmentalism will stay inadequate and keep on coming up short at the undertaking of important, long haul social change. Accordingly, TNCs need to move away from this outward perspective and see nature past its fiscal worth â to see nature for its very own respect. Moving to an ecocentric perspective where the biosphere turns into the primary focal point of concern would supplant the fragmentary view with the possibility that everything is associated (Madsen, 2016). Just with an ideological move from an outward to inherent perspective will oil organizations, for example, BP cease from ‘compromising at the conditions cost.>
