An article critique involves the identification, evaluation, critique, and response to an author’s study, both positive and negative. An article critique is an active process that involves careful consideration of the articleâs content, rather than providing a simple summary. Critiquing research allows you to develop an understanding of the current state of knowledge, which is essential to the development of an understanding of the “big picture” of a discipline as a whole. Research a health promotion/behavior change intervention for a population in one of the following: school, community, worksite, or health setting. Select a peer-reviewed journal article related to the health promotion/behavior change intervention you chose. The article must have been published within the last 2 years. Articles from news outlets, magazines, or blogs are not appropriate for this assignment. Critique the article by responding to the questions in the “Article Critique Worksheet.”
Sample Solution
The language required to motivate and convince in political speeches is a prepared mode of linguistic utilization very distinctive from others in that its imperative is inherently linked with its construction and delivery. although regarded and often hired linguistic devices, together with rhetoric, are necessarily an intrinsic part of this type of syntax, the general reason governs the fashion a long way greater immediately and bears the weighty implication of each negative and advantageous affect: in different words, when do âmotivationâ and âpersuasionâ emerge as âpropagandaâ? so as to demonstrate the energy of speech to encourage and convince, it’s miles consequently vital to appearance closely at some speeches which have tried to perform this with various ranges of success when it comes to the instances in which they have been made. although âit’s far often said that occasions, no longer speeches, decide the final results of electionsâ it’s miles similarly proper that the language used to steer the human beings addressed as to how they should view activities is a determining element in a nice or poor reaction. In terms of ancient resonance, one may keep in mind how Shakespeare gives the difference between Brutusâ appeal to purpose and Mark Antonyâs attraction to emotion while each addresses the without difficulty manipulated mob in turn following the assassination of Julius Caesar in his play of that name written in a time of modern political anxiety, 1599. It has also been visible to be real in extra current instances when, following the assassination of Ghandi in 1948, Nehru spoke to the humans of India in phrases designed specially to calm what became a potentially inflammatory scenario with the aid of the use of phrases of cope with remarkably much like Shakespeareâs âbuddyâs Romans, Countrymenâ, Nehru selected to speak to the multitude as âbuddies and comradesâ. both usages of familial terms encouraged emotions of empathy and team spirit, persuading the ones gift that a sense expressed with the aid of one guy should immediately unite, replicate and pacify the ones of a country. Tony Blairâs famous epithet âthe human beingsâs Princessâ did a great deal the identical following the dying of Princess Diana in 1995. In all of these cases, the proper phrases at the proper time persuaded humans to trust within the speakerâs ethos and stimulated them to react as the orator wished. The shifting, motivational and persuasive rhetoric of Winston Churchillâs wartime speeches stays profoundly powerful and is an exceptional way of demonstrating the effectiveness of language. throughout the darkest days of the conflict, in 1940, Churchillâs âwe can in no way surrenderâ caused the British people to understand wish in which virtually there has been none. His syntax, both personal and normal, like that of the emotive language in advance discussed, relies heavily upon the pronoun âweâ as a connective with the ones he is addressing: we shall now not flag nor fail. we will pass directly to the quit. we shall fight in France and at the seas and oceans; we will fight with developing confidence and developing energy within the air. we shall protect our island regardless of the fee may be; we will fight on beaches, landing grounds, in fields, in streets and at the hills. we shall in no way give up [â¦] what’s frequently forgotten is that this speech begins with a summation of the catastrophic development of the war up to this point. Churchillâs brilliance, right here, is in announcing nothing of authentic substance however concentrating instead at the emphasis of the countryâs harmony. The personal pronoun âweâ, that is repeated at the beginning of every sentence and echoed in âourâ, produces the desired effect of proclaiming the collective attention of resistance, whilst concurrently stressing, inferentially and through inversion, the possible terrible outcomes of disunity. that is, only with the aid of the behaviour Churchill proclaims to be accepted can the state wish to continue to exist. as well as repetition and rhetoric, the persuasive approach right here employs alliteration, in âflag nor failâ, the language of the poetically picturesque in âseas and oceansâ and references to home in âfieldsâ, âstreetsâ and âhillsâ: in different>
The language required to motivate and convince in political speeches is a prepared mode of linguistic utilization very distinctive from others in that its imperative is inherently linked with its construction and delivery. although regarded and often hired linguistic devices, together with rhetoric, are necessarily an intrinsic part of this type of syntax, the general reason governs the fashion a long way greater immediately and bears the weighty implication of each negative and advantageous affect: in different words, when do âmotivationâ and âpersuasionâ emerge as âpropagandaâ? so as to demonstrate the energy of speech to encourage and convince, it’s miles consequently vital to appearance closely at some speeches which have tried to perform this with various ranges of success when it comes to the instances in which they have been made. although âit’s far often said that occasions, no longer speeches, decide the final results of electionsâ it’s miles similarly proper that the language used to steer the human beings addressed as to how they should view activities is a determining element in a nice or poor reaction. In terms of ancient resonance, one may keep in mind how Shakespeare gives the difference between Brutusâ appeal to purpose and Mark Antonyâs attraction to emotion while each addresses the without difficulty manipulated mob in turn following the assassination of Julius Caesar in his play of that name written in a time of modern political anxiety, 1599. It has also been visible to be real in extra current instances when, following the assassination of Ghandi in 1948, Nehru spoke to the humans of India in phrases designed specially to calm what became a potentially inflammatory scenario with the aid of the use of phrases of cope with remarkably much like Shakespeareâs âbuddyâs Romans, Countrymenâ, Nehru selected to speak to the multitude as âbuddies and comradesâ. both usages of familial terms encouraged emotions of empathy and team spirit, persuading the ones gift that a sense expressed with the aid of one guy should immediately unite, replicate and pacify the ones of a country. Tony Blairâs famous epithet âthe human beingsâs Princessâ did a great deal the identical following the dying of Princess Diana in 1995. In all of these cases, the proper phrases at the proper time persuaded humans to trust within the speakerâs ethos and stimulated them to react as the orator wished. The shifting, motivational and persuasive rhetoric of Winston Churchillâs wartime speeches stays profoundly powerful and is an exceptional way of demonstrating the effectiveness of language. throughout the darkest days of the conflict, in 1940, Churchillâs âwe can in no way surrenderâ caused the British people to understand wish in which virtually there has been none. His syntax, both personal and normal, like that of the emotive language in advance discussed, relies heavily upon the pronoun âweâ as a connective with the ones he is addressing: we shall now not flag nor fail. we will pass directly to the quit. we shall fight in France and at the seas and oceans; we will fight with developing confidence and developing energy within the air. we shall protect our island regardless of the fee may be; we will fight on beaches, landing grounds, in fields, in streets and at the hills. we shall in no way give up [â¦] what’s frequently forgotten is that this speech begins with a summation of the catastrophic development of the war up to this point. Churchillâs brilliance, right here, is in announcing nothing of authentic substance however concentrating instead at the emphasis of the countryâs harmony. The personal pronoun âweâ, that is repeated at the beginning of every sentence and echoed in âourâ, produces the desired effect of proclaiming the collective attention of resistance, whilst concurrently stressing, inferentially and through inversion, the possible terrible outcomes of disunity. that is, only with the aid of the behaviour Churchill proclaims to be accepted can the state wish to continue to exist. as well as repetition and rhetoric, the persuasive approach right here employs alliteration, in âflag nor failâ, the language of the poetically picturesque in âseas and oceansâ and references to home in âfieldsâ, âstreetsâ and âhillsâ: in different>
